|
Measuring
progress in nature
conservation against
the Convention on
Biological Diversity
and the Pan-European
Biological and Landscape
Diversity Strategy:
|
The
Convention on Biological Diversity
The Convention
was opened for signature at
the United Nations Conference
on Environment and Development
(UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro
in June 1992. It entered into
force on 29 December 1993
and currently has 188 Parties.
The principal
objectives of the Convention
on Biological Diversity are
• the conservation of biological
diversity,
• sustainable use of its components,
• the fair and equitable sharing
of the benefits arising out
of the utilization of genetic
resources, including by appropriate
access to genetic resources
and by appropriate transfer
of relevant technologies,
as well as by appropriate
funding.
The Convention
recognizes that the key to
maintaining biological diversity
depends upon using this diversity
in a sustainable manner. The
Convention translates its
guiding objectives of conservation,
sustainable use and equitable
sharing of benefits into binding
commitments in its substantive
provisions contained in Articles
6 to 20. These articles contain
key provisions on, among others:
measures for the conservation
of biological diversity, both
in situ and ex situ; incentives
for the conservation and sustainable
use of biological diversity;
research and training; public
awareness and education; assessing
the impacts of projects upon
biological diversity; regulating
access to genetic resources;
access to and transfer of
technology; and the provision
of financial resources.
Institutional arrangements
In addition
to its substantive provisions,
the Convention establishes
institutional arrangements
which provide a mechanism
for the further development
of, and for monitoring the
implementation of, the Convention
through meetings, work programmes,
reviews and negotiations.
Three institutions are established
by the Convention: the Conference
of the Parties (COP), the
Subsidiary Body on Scientific,
Technical and Technological
Advice (SBSTTA) and the Secretariat.
Further, the Convention enables
the COP to establish additional
subsidiary bodies as it deems
necessary for the implementation
of the Convention (e.g. Working
Group on Access and Benefit-sharing;
Working Group on Article 8
(j) and Related Provisions,
Working Group on Protected
Areas).
The Conference
of the Parties is the governing
body of the Convention, its
key function is to keep under
review the implementation
of the Convention and to steer
its development. Other important
functions of the COP include
adoption of the budget, the
consideration of national
reports, the adoption of protocols
or annexes and the development
of guidance to the financial
mechanism.
Until now
seven ordinary COPs were held,
the last in February 2004
in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
The first extraordinary meeting
of the COP (ExCOP) was held
in Cartagena, Colombia, in
February 1999, to consider
and adopt the first protocol
to the Convention. The extraordinary
meeting was suspended, and
resumed in January 2000 in
Montreal, where it concluded
its work and adopted the Cartagena
Protocol on Biosafety.
The Subsidiary
Body on Technical and Technological
Advice (SBSTTA) is an open-ended
intergovernmental scientific
advisory body, to provide
the COP with advice and recommendations
on scientific, technical and
technological aspects of the
implementation of the Convention.
Specific functions of SBSTTA
include: providing scientific
and technical assessments
of the status of biological
diversity; preparing scientific
and technical assessments
of the measures taken to implement
the Convention; identifying
innovative, efficient and
state of the art technologies
and know how, etc. It submits
its advice to the COP in the
form of SBSTTA recommendations.
The COP considers SBSTTA’s
advice on relevant issues
before adopting its decisions.
In some instances, the COP
has explicitly endorsed specific
SBSTTA recommendations in
whole or in part.
The principal
functions of the Secretariat
are to prepare for and service
meetings of the COP and other
subsidiary bodies of the Convention
and to coordinate with other
relevant international bodies.
The host institution of the
Secretariat is UNEP, the Secretariat
is located in Montreal, Canada.
Financial mechanism
The Global
Environment Facility (GEF)
provides the financial resources
to developing countries for
the purposes of the Convention.
The financial mechanism functions
under the authority and guidance
of, and is accountable to,
the COP.
Clearing-house mechanism
The Convention
has established a "Clearing-House
Mechanism" to ensure
that all governments have
access to the information
and technologies they need
for their work on biodiversity.
The Clearing-House is coordinated
by the Executive Secretary
and overseen and guided by
an Informal Advisory Committee
(IAC) set up by the Parties
to the Convention.
The Clearing-house mission:
• Promote and facilitate technical
and scientific cooperation,
within and between countries,
• Develop a global mechanism
for exchanging and integrating
information on biodiversity,
• Develop the necessary human
and technological network.
http://www.biodiv.org/chm
Thematic Programmes
The COP
has initiated work on seven
thematic work programmes,
addressing:
• marine and coastal biodiversity
• agricultural biodiversity
• forest biodiversity
• island biodiversity
• inland waters biodiversity
• dry and sub-humid lands
biodiversity
• mountain biodiversity
Each thematic programme establishes
a vision for, and basic principles
to guide future work; sets
out key issues for consideration;
identifies potential outputs;
and suggests a timetable and
means for achieving these
outputs. Periodic review of
the implementation of the
work programme by the COP
and SBSTTA is provided. It
is envisaged that implementation
of the work programmes involves
contributions from Parties,
the Secretariat, relevant
intergovernmental organisations
and other organisations.
Cross-Cutting
Issues
Over and
above the thematic programmes
there are a number of other
items on the COP's agenda
addressing key cross-cutting
issues of relevance to all
thematic areas. Essentially
these correspond to the issues
addressed in the Convention's
substantive provisions in
Articles 6-20. For example,
work has been initiated on
access to genetic resources;
traditional knowledge, innovations
and practices (Article 8(j));
intellectual property rights;
indicators; taxonomy; public
education and awareness; incentives
and alien species.
Multi-year programme of work
of the Conference of the Parties
up to 2010
At its seventh
meeting, the COP adopted a
programme of work for its
eighth to tenth meetings,
specifying the thematic and
cross-cutting, as well as
strategic issues for in-depth
consideration. Besides the
COP will review progress in
implementation of the Strategic
Plan and follow-up on progress
towards the 2010 target and
relevant Millennium Development
Goals (global targets and
related measures, such as
monitoring and indicators
and trends of biodiversity),
as well as refine mechanisms
to support implementation
(e.g. financial mechanism,
clearing-house mechanism,
technology transfer, capacity-building)
at each of these meetings.
Ecosystem
approach
At its fourth
meeting, the COP adopted the
ecosystem approach as a framework
for the analysis and implementation
of the objectives of the Convention.
In effect, the ecosystem approach
is the fundamental paradigm
for the Convention’s activities.
The COP endorsed a description
of the ecosystem approach
as well as certain operational
guidance, and recommended
the application of a number
of principles of the ecosystem
approach.
Principle 1: The
objectives of management
of land, water and
living resources are
a matter of societal
choice.
Principle 2: Management
should be decentralized
to the lowest appropriate
level.
Principle 3: Ecosystem
managers should consider
the effects (actual
or potential) of their
activities on adjacent
and other ecosystems.
Principle 4: Recognizing
potential gains from
management, there
is usually a need
to understand and
manage the ecosystem
in an economic context.
Any such ecosystem-management
programme should:
(a) Reduce those market distortions that adversely affect
biological diversity;
(b) Align incentives
to promote biodiversity
conservation and sustainable
use;
(c) Internalize costs
and benefits in the
given ecosystem to
the extent feasible.
Principle 5: Conservation
of ecosystem structure
and functioning, in
order to maintain
ecosystem services,
should be a priority
target of the ecosystem
approach.
Principle 6: Ecosystems
must be managed within
the limits of their
functioning.
Principle 7: The
ecosystem approach
should be undertaken
at the appropriate
spatial and temporal
scales.
Principle 8: Recognizing
the varying temporal
scales and lag-effects
that characterize
ecosystem processes,
objectives for ecosystem
management should
be set for the long
term.
Principle 9: Management
must recognize that
change is inevitable.
Principle 10: The
ecosystem approach
should seek the appropriate
balance between, and
integration of, conservation
and use of biological
diversity.
Principle 11: The
ecosystem approach
should consider all
forms of relevant
information, including
scientific and indigenous
and local knowledge,
innovations and practices.
Principle 12: The
ecosystem approach
should involve all
relevant sectors of
society and scientific
disciplines.
|
The principles amount to a
strategy for the integrated
or holistic management of
resources through modern scientific
adaptive management practices.
Essentially, they require
that the process of decision
making be transparent and
take into account all relevant
factors. Collectively the
principles are similar to
principles associated with
strategic environmental assessment
methods.
The Strategic Plan
to the CBD
COP 6 adopted a Strategic
Plan for the Convention on
Biological Diversity to provide
strategic and operational
guidance for the implementation
of the programmes of work
of the COP and SBSTTA.
In its mission
statement the Strategic Plan
commits Parties to a more
effective and coherent implementation
of the three objectives of
the convention, and to achieve
by 2010 a significant reduction
of the current rate of biodiversity
loss at the global, regional
and national level as a contribution
to poverty alleviation and
to the benefit of all life
on earth.
The Plan contains four strategic
goals and objectives of the
Convention:
(1) The Convention is fulfilling
its leadership role in international
biodiversity issues;
(2) Parties
have improved financial, human,
scientific, technical, and
technological capacity to
implement the Convention;
(3) National
biodiversity strategies and
action plans and the integration
of biodiversity concerns into
relevant sectors serve as
an effective framework for
the implementation of the
Convention; and
(4) There
is a better understanding
of the importance of biodiversity
and of the Convention, and
this has led to broader engagement
across society in implementation.
The Strategic
Plan will be implemented through
the programmes of work of
the Convention, implementation
of national biodiversity strategies
and action plans, and other
national, regional and international
initiatives.
Cartagena Protocol
on Biosafety
In January
2000, the COP adopted the
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
in accordance with Article
28 of the Convention it entered
into force in September 2003.
The Protocol seeks to protect
biological diversity from
the potential risks posed
by living modified organisms
resulting from modern biotechnology.
It establishes an advance
informed agreement (AIA) procedure
for ensuring that countries
are provided with the information
necessary to make informed
decisions before agreeing
to the import of such organisms
into their territory. The
Protocol contains reference
to a precautionary approach
and reaffirms the precaution
language in Principle 15 of
the Rio Declaration on Environment
and Development. The Protocol
also establishes a Biosafety
Clearing-House to facilitate
the exchange of information
on living modified organisms
and to assist countries in
the implementation of the
Protocol.
Convention
Text
Clearing-House
Mechanism to the CBD
Biosafety
Clearing-House
Strategic
Plan to the CBD
Ecosystem
approach
|